- Top page
- Requests for having additional charts at this website
- Remarks on the forthcoming books
- Preliminary remarks
- Design and Examples
- Glossary
- English Experiments
- EPSA [31]-1 (=[31]-8)
- EPSA [31]-2 (=[31]-9)
- EPSA [31]-3 (=[31]-10)
- EPSA [31]-4 (=[31]-11)
- EPSA [31]-5 (=[31]-12)
- EPSA [31]-7 (=[31]-13)
- Japanese Experiments
- a- vs. so-
- EPSA [10]-5
- EPSA [10]-10
- EPSA [10]-11
- soko and soitu
- EPSA [3]-7
- LF c-command condition on FD
- EPSA [33]-2
- EPSA [33]-3
- EPSA [33]-8
- EPSA [33]-9
- EPSA [33]-17
- EPSA [33]-18
- EPSA [1]-18
- EPSA [1]-20
- EPSA [1]-21
- EPSA [1]-33
- EPSA [1]-34
- otagai
- EPSA [5]-1
- EPSA [5]-3
- EPSA [5]-5
- local disjointness
- EPSA [35]-4
Hajime Hoji .Language Faculty Science |
 © Cambridge University Press |
EPSA [31]-4 (=[31]-11)
This is discussed in Chapter 6. It is one of the two Main-Experiments in English discussed in the CUP book. The other Main-Experiment in English is [31]-5 (=[31]-12), which is discussed in Chapter 7, along with Japanese Experiments. There are three SGs, but SG3 is not discussed in the CUP book and the result charts below exclude SG3. But, the results on SG3 are included in the "Raw Data" files given below. LG1: BVA(every boy, his); LG2: BVA(no boy, his)
Design
Examples
Results
Effects of informant classification on a *Schema-based prediction
Informant list for [31]-4:
based on: [31]-1, every; &
based on: [31]-1, no
This means that the informant classification is based on the result of [31]-1, only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)).
[31]-4 Summary, based on the above informant list
[31]-4 Lexical-group-based, based on the above informant list
Informant list for [31]-11:
based on: [31]-8, every; &
based on: [31]-8, no
This means that the informant classification here is based on the result of [31]-8, only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)).
[31]-11 Summary, based on the above informant list
[31]-11 Lexical-group-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)).
[31]-11 Summary, based on the above informant list
[31]-11 Lexical-group-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)).
[31]-4 Summary, based on the above informant list
[31]-4 Lexical-group-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)), and also based on [31]-7.
[31]-11 Summary, based on the above informant list
[31]-11 Lexical-group-based, based on the above informant list
[31]-11 Schema-group-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)), and also based on [31]-7.
[31]-4 Summary, based on the above informant list
[31]-4 Lexical-group-based, based on the above informant list
[31]-4 Schema-group-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)), and also based on [31]-7 and [31]-13.
[31]-11 Summary, based on the above informant list
[31]-11 Lexical-group-based, based on the above informant list
[31]-11 Schema-group-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)), and also based on [31]-7 and [31]-13.
[31]-4 Summary, based on the above informant list
[31]-4 Lexical-group-based, based on the above informant list
[31]-4 Schema-group-based, based on the above informant list
See the Results of [31]-3 (=[31]-10) for the absence of similar effects of informant classification in the case of Binding Condition C/D.
Effects of informant classification on okSchema-based predictions
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)). (This has been given above.)
[31]-11 Schema-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)), and also based on [31]-9.
[31]-11 Schema-group-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)), and also based on [31]-9 and [31]-2.
[31]-11 Schema-group-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)). (This has been given above twice.)
[31]-11, Schema-group 2, Summary, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)), and also based on [31]-9 and [31]-2.
[31]-11, Schema-group 2, Summary, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)). (This has been given above three times.)
[31]-11, Schema-group 2, Lexical-group-based, based on the above informant list
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)), and also based on [31]-9 and [31]-2.
[31]-11, Schema-group 2, Lexical-group-based, based on the above informant list
The one-sentence-at-a-time test type vs. the three-sentences-at-a-time test type
We are considering only Schema groups 1 and 2.
[31]-4 Three sentences at a time
[31]-11 One sentence at a time
[31]-11 Three sentences at a time
The informant classification is based on [31]-1 as well as [31]-8 only considering Lexical groups 1 and 2 (BVA(every boy, his) and BVA(no boy, his)).
[31]-11, One sentence at a time, based on the above informant list
[31]-11, Three sentences at a time, based on the above informant list