EPSA [31] #7 Answer Data List

9989 answers

EPSA [31] : BVA in English
Experiment #7 [Straight List of Raw Data]

The answers are listed as they have been reported.
The blue boxes are for okExamples; the light pink boxes are for *Examples.
The value in the box under β represents the reported judgment; when it is not 0 for a *Example, the box is marked yellow.

codename	example				β	time	test type
L1334295770nE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:39)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:39)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:39)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
X1334106255oC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:39)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:39)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:39)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:39)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:39)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
X1334106255oC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
X1334106255oC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:37)	Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334295770nE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
X1334106255oC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
X1334106255oC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (in sets)
X1334106255oC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
X1334106255oC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:40)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334295770nE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:42)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:42)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:42)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334295770nE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334295770nE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:41)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:43)	Five-ranking (in sets)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:44)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
k1334205095lEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.13 (11:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (12:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (12:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:21)	Yes-or-No (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.13 (12:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334286737.E	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (12:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334286737.E	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (12:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334286737.E	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:27)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:27)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:27)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334286737.E	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:27)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:27)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:27)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1334294091aE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
A1334294091aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (12:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334286737.E	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:27)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:27)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:27)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:27)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (12:27)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334286737.E	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (12:27)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (14:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (14:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (14:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (14:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (14:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (14:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (14:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334195423sE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (14:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (14:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (14:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (14:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (in sets)
N1334195423sE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	75	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334195423sE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (14:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334360760kE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (16:59)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334360760kE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (17:00)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:00)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (17:00)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (17:00)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (17:00)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:00)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:00)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:00)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.13 (17:00)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	75	2012.04.13 (17:00)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:00)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	75	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334360760kE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334360760kE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:01)	Five-ranking (one each)
N1334263124iE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
N1334263124iE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (17:30)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
D1334281514rE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (18:36)	Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:39)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:39)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:39)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:40)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:41)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:41)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:41)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:42)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:42)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:42)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:42)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:42)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:42)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:42)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:42)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:42)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:43)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:45)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (in sets)
S1334384666sE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
S1334384666sE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
S1334384666sE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:46)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.13 (23:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.13 (23:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.13 (23:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:52)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.13 (23:52)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:52)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:54)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334130439aC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334130439aC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.13 (23:55)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334374479eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334374479eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (11:15)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (12:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (12:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:11)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:15)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:15)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:15)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:15)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:15)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (12:15)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:16)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:16)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:16)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:16)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:16)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (12:16)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:16)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:16)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:16)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:16)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:16)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:16)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334359126nE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334359126nE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (12:17)	Five-ranking (one each)
V1334451161rE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1334451161rE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:09)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334141810hK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334141810hK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334141810hK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:12)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1334180602iE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:19)	Yes-or-No (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:33)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:33)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:33)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:33)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:33)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:33)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (18:33)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:33)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:33)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (18:34)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:34)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:34)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:34)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:34)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:34)	Five-ranking (in sets)
L1334180602iE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
L1334180602iE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (18:35)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:19)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:19)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:19)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:19)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:19)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:19)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:23)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:23)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:23)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:23)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:23)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:23)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:20)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334451457nK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
s1334451925gK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	50	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	50	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:24)	Yes-or-No (one each)
s1334451925gK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	50	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334451457nK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
s1334451925gK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	50	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	50	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
s1334451925gK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.14 (19:25)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334451457nK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:55)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:55)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:55)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:56)	Yes-or-No (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	25	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
T1334265187yK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	25	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	25	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
T1334265187yK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (19:58)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (20:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (20:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (20:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334452893r	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (20:03)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334452893r	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.14 (22:31)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.14 (22:31)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (22:31)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (22:31)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (22:31)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (22:31)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.14 (22:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.14 (22:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (22:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (22:33)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (22:33)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (22:33)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334452893r	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334452893r	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.14 (22:34)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (23:45)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.14 (23:45)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.14 (23:45)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	0	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
v1334469312mE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	0	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.14 (23:54)	Yes-or-No (one each)
v1334469312mE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (in sets)
v1334469312mE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
v1334469312mE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	50	2012.04.15 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
G1334512739nK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (11:35)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (11:35)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (11:35)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1334512739nK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (11:36)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (13:32)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.15 (13:32)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (13:32)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (13:32)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.15 (13:32)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (13:32)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (13:32)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.15 (13:32)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (13:32)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (13:32)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (13:32)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (13:32)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (13:33)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (13:33)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (13:33)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (13:33)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (13:33)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (13:33)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (14:49)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (14:49)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (14:49)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334200308@E	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (14:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (15:47)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (15:47)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (15:47)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:47)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (15:47)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:47)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (15:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (15:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (15:50)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (15:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (15:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (15:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:51)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (15:52)	Yes-or-No (one each)
R1334474032aE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (15:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
R1334474032aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
C1334529685rE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
C1334529685rE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (16:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (16:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334529685rE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1334474032aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
R1334474032aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:00)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:52)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334444600lE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (16:53)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.15 (16:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (16:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.15 (16:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.15 (16:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.15 (16:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.15 (16:57)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (16:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (16:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (16:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (16:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (16:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (16:58)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	25	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334444600lE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334444600lE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.15 (16:59)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:10)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:11)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (18:11)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:11)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:14)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:14)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:14)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334526479gE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (18:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (18:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.15 (18:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.15 (18:20)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:20)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:20)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (18:21)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (18:21)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (18:21)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334526479gE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334526479gE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:22)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:45)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:45)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:45)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:46)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:46)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:46)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:46)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:46)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:46)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:46)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (18:46)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:46)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334538257uE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:47)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334538257uE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (18:49)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (18:49)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:49)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334538257uE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334538257uE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (18:50)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334541300cC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (19:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (19:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (19:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (19:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (19:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (19:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (19:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (19:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (19:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334541300cC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (19:18)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545276aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	50	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	50	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545276aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:10)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:14)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:14)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:14)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:14)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:14)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:15)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:16)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (20:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334298242yEC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334298242yEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:19)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:21)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:21)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:21)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:21)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:21)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:21)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:22)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:23)	Yes-or-No (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (20:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (20:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:25)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334545783gC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334545783gC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:27)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:27)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:27)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334545783gC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:27)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:27)	Five-ranking (in sets)
Y1334545783gC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:27)	Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:26)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:34)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:34)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:34)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:34)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:34)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:34)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:34)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:34)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:34)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:34)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:34)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:35)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:36)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:36)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	50	2012.04.15 (20:36)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	50	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	50	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545423eEK	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545423eEK	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (20:37)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334549763e	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (21:25)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (21:25)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:25)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334549763e	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:42)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (21:42)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:42)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:43)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:44)	Yes-or-No (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (21:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (21:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (21:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (21:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:51)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (in sets)
P1334293018eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
P1334293018eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (21:52)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:04)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:05)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334265958aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:06)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	50	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:10)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334265958aE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334265958aE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:11)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:13)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:13)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:13)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:14)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:14)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:14)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:16)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:17)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334545866nEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334545866nEC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	75	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	75	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334545866nEC	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	75	2012.04.15 (22:18)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:25)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:25)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:25)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:26)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:27)	Yes-or-No (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:30)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:30)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:30)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:31)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:31)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:31)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:31)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:31)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (in sets)
M1334200057eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334200057eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.15 (22:32)	Five-ranking (one each)
M1334101407oE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	0	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	0	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1334101407oE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	0	2012.04.15 (23:06)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:00)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:00)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:00)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.16 (00:00)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.16 (00:00)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:00)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.16 (00:00)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.16 (00:00)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:00)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
l1334559279eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
l1334559279eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
l1334559279eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	0	2012.04.16 (00:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	0	2012.04.16 (00:02)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
l1334559279eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
l1334559279eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
l1334559279eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:03)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:01)	Yes-or-No (one each)
E1334254621eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	25	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:04)	Five-ranking (in sets)
E1334254621eE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	75	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	2	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	25	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	3	1	1	Every boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	25	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	50	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	25	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	75	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	25	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
E1334254621eE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	25	2012.04.16 (00:05)	Five-ranking (one each)
Y1334185414iC	1	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:11)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC	2	2	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) No company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.16 (00:11)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC	3	2	3	No company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:11)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:11)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:11)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:11)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:12)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:12)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:12)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC	1	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:12)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC	2	2	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) No boy criticized his own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:12)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1334185414iC	3	2	1	No boy criticized Mike's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:12)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	1	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:12)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	2	1	3	(Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota) Every company praised its own CEO.	0	2012.04.16 (00:12)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	3	1	3	Every company praised Toyota's CEO.	100	2012.04.16 (00:12)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	1	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:12)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	2	1	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) Every girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:12)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	3	1	2	Every girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:12)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	1	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:13)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	2	2	2	(Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.) No girl criticized her own father.	0	2012.04.16 (00:13)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	3	2	2	No girl criticized Mary's father.	100	2012.04.16 (00:13)	Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334525971oE	1	1	1	(Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.) Every boy criticized his father.	100

EPSA [31] : BVA in EnglishExperiment #7 [Straight List of Raw Data]

EPSA [31] : BVA in English
Experiment #7 [Straight List of Raw Data]