4296 answers

EPSA [31] : BVA in English
Experiment #13 [Straight List of Raw Data]

The answers are listed as they have been reported.
The blue boxes are for okExamples; the light pink boxes are for *Examples.
The value in the box under β represents the reported judgment; when it is not 0 for a *Example, the box is marked yellow.

codename example β time test type
A1334698071xE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.20 (01:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.20 (01:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.20 (01:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.20 (01:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.20 (01:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.20 (01:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.20 (01:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.20 (01:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.20 (01:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.20 (01:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.20 (01:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.20 (01:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.20 (01:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.20 (01:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.20 (01:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.20 (01:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.20 (01:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1334698071xE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.20 (01:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.22 (22:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.22 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2012.04.22 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.22 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.22 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.22 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.22 (22:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1334521583eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
K1334521583eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2012.04.22 (22:19) Five-ranking (one each)
J1334125186eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.23 (09:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.23 (09:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2012.04.23 (09:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.23 (09:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.23 (09:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.23 (09:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.23 (09:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.23 (09:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.23 (09:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.23 (09:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.23 (09:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.23 (09:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.23 (09:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.23 (09:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.23 (09:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.23 (09:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.23 (09:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.23 (09:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.23 (09:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.23 (09:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.23 (09:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2012.04.23 (09:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2012.04.23 (09:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.23 (09:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.23 (09:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.23 (09:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.23 (09:46) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.23 (09:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.23 (09:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.23 (09:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2012.04.23 (09:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.23 (09:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.23 (09:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2012.04.23 (09:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2012.04.23 (09:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1334125186eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.23 (09:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1334186019iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1334186019iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2012.04.24 (11:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
o1335421151gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2012.04.25 (23:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
o1335421151gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2012.04.25 (23:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
o1335421151gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2012.04.25 (23:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.03.26 (18:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.26 (18:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.26 (18:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.03.26 (18:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.26 (18:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.26 (18:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.03.26 (18:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.26 (18:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.26 (18:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.26 (18:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.26 (18:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.26 (18:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.03.26 (18:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.26 (18:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.26 (18:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.03.26 (18:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.26 (18:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1359599518hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.26 (18:19) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.26 (21:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.26 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.26 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.26 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.26 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.26 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.26 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.26 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.26 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.26 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.03.26 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.26 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.26 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.03.26 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.26 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.26 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.03.26 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.26 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.26 (21:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.03.26 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.26 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.26 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.03.26 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.26 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.26 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.03.26 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.26 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1359755456eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.26 (21:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.27 (07:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.27 (07:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (07:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.27 (07:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.27 (07:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (07:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (07:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.27 (07:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (07:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.27 (07:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.27 (07:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (07:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.27 (07:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.27 (07:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (07:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (07:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.27 (07:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (07:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1358925637nEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (07:50) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359150812lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.03.27 (11:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.27 (11:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (11:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.03.27 (11:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.27 (11:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (11:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.03.27 (11:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.27 (11:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (11:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.27 (11:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.27 (11:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (11:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.27 (11:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.27 (11:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (11:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (11:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.27 (11:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1359150812lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (11:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.27 (17:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.27 (17:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (17:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (17:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.27 (17:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (17:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.27 (17:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.27 (17:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (17:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.27 (17:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.27 (17:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (17:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (17:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.27 (17:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (17:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.27 (17:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.27 (17:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
H1360009661iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (17:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (18:38) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359010635nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (18:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360050378bE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360050378bE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.27 (20:37) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.28 (01:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.03.28 (01:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.28 (01:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.28 (01:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (01:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.28 (01:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.28 (01:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.28 (01:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.28 (01:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.28 (01:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.28 (01:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.28 (01:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.28 (01:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.28 (01:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.28 (01:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.28 (01:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (01:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.28 (01:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.03.28 (01:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.03.28 (01:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.28 (01:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.03.28 (01:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.28 (01:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.28 (01:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.03.28 (01:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (01:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.28 (01:24) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.03.28 (01:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (01:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.28 (01:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.28 (01:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.28 (01:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.28 (01:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.28 (01:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.28 (01:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360008478sK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.28 (01:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.28 (12:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.03.28 (12:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.28 (12:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.28 (12:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:24) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:25) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:28) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1358923088lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
A1358923088lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.28 (12:29) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
N1358988752iC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.29 (15:21) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.30 (23:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.30 (23:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.30 (23:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:23) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.30 (23:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.30 (23:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.30 (23:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.30 (23:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.30 (23:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.30 (23:27) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1358934805aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
L1358934805aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.30 (23:30) Five-ranking (one each)
N1359739847rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.31 (00:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.03.31 (00:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.31 (00:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.31 (00:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.03.31 (00:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.31 (00:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.31 (00:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.03.31 (00:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.31 (00:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.31 (00:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.03.31 (00:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.31 (00:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.31 (00:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.03.31 (00:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.31 (00:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.31 (00:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.03.31 (00:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359739847rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.31 (00:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.03.31 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.31 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.31 (12:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.31 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.31 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.31 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.03.31 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.03.31 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.03.31 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.03.31 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.03.31 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.03.31 (12:42) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.31 (12:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.31 (12:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.31 (12:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.03.31 (12:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.03.31 (12:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358915929tE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.03.31 (12:43) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.01 (10:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.01 (10:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.01 (10:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.01 (10:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.01 (10:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.01 (10:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.01 (10:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.01 (10:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.01 (10:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.01 (10:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.01 (10:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.01 (10:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.01 (10:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.01 (10:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.01 (10:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.01 (10:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.01 (10:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360119773cE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.01 (10:28) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.01 (19:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.01 (19:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.01 (19:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.01 (19:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.01 (19:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.01 (19:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.01 (19:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.01 (19:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.01 (19:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.01 (19:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.01 (19:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.01 (19:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.01 (19:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.01 (19:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.01 (19:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.01 (19:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.01 (19:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1358908372sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.01 (19:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
N1359702779eE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.01 (20:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.01 (20:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.01 (20:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.01 (20:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.04.01 (20:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.01 (20:16) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.01 (20:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.01 (20:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.01 (20:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.01 (20:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.01 (20:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.01 (20:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.01 (20:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.01 (20:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.01 (20:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.01 (20:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.01 (20:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
N1359702779eE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.01 (20:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
Nh1364939048E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
Nh1364939048E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.02 (14:56) Five-ranking (one each)
D1359962353aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.02 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.02 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.02 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.02 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.02 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.02 (15:39) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.02 (15:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.02 (15:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.02 (15:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.02 (15:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.02 (15:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.02 (15:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.02 (15:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.02 (15:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.02 (15:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.04.02 (15:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.02 (15:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
D1359962353aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.02 (15:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Dd1364962157EC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.02 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.03 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.03 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.03 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.03 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.03 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.03 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.03 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.03 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.03 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.03 (12:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.03 (12:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359323860lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.03 (12:40) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.03 (13:18) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (13:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.03 (13:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.03 (13:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2013.04.03 (13:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.03 (13:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 25 2013.04.03 (13:22) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360091263rE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
M1360091263rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.03 (13:23) Five-ranking (one each)
C1358990984lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.03 (15:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.03 (15:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.03 (15:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.03 (15:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.03 (15:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.03 (15:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.03 (15:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.03 (15:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.03 (15:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (15:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (15:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.03 (15:58) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.03 (15:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.03 (15:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.03 (15:59) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1358990984lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
C1358990984lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.03 (16:00) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (04:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (04:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (04:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (04:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (04:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (04:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:51) Yes-or-No (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.04 (04:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (04:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (04:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.04 (04:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (04:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (04:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (in sets)
R1360122774nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
R1360122774nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (04:55) Five-ranking (one each)
B1359060448tE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.04 (13:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.04 (13:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.04 (13:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.04 (13:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (13:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (13:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (13:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.04 (13:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.04 (13:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (13:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.04 (13:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.04 (13:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (13:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1359060448tE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (13:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (15:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (15:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (15:40) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (15:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (15:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360001737cE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:41) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (15:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:52) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.04 (15:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359272846gK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359272846gK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (15:54) Five-ranking (one each)
T1360045180iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (16:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (16:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (16:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (16:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (16:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (16:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (16:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (16:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (16:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (16:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (16:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (16:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (16:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (16:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (16:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (16:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (16:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045180iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (16:23) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (18:13) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (18:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (18:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (18:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (18:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (18:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (18:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
j1359676899oE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (18:14) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (18:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (18:46) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (18:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (18:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (18:49) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (18:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (18:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (18:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (18:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (18:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (18:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (18:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (18:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (18:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (18:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (18:51) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (18:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (18:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (18:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (18:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (18:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (18:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (18:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (18:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (18:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1358920836dE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (18:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (20:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (20:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (20:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (20:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
V1359077867pE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.04 (20:23) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360095539nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (21:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360095539nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (21:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (21:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (21:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (21:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (21:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (21:11) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.04 (21:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (21:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.04 (21:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.04 (21:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.04 (21:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (21:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (21:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.04 (21:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (21:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (21:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.04 (21:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.04 (21:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.04 (21:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (21:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
C13600536017E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (21:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:53) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.04 (21:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (21:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (21:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (21:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
G1359957424nEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (21:54) Five-ranking (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
W1360089026nEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.04 (22:33) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
a1360086190vE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.04 (23:30) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360097914uE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (00:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (00:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (00:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (00:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (00:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (00:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.05 (00:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.05 (00:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (00:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (00:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360097914uE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:12) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (00:16) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1359320451hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Y1359420261zC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (00:29) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 25 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
Y1359420261zC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
Y1359420261zC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.04.05 (00:30) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:30) Yes-or-No (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 25 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2013.04.05 (00:32) Five-ranking (in sets)
B1358982947aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
B1358982947aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (00:33) Five-ranking (one each)
S1359870089cE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (01:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (01:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (01:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (01:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (01:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (01:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
S1359870089cE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (01:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1359870089cE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.04.05 (01:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1359870089cE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.04.05 (01:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1359870089cE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (01:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1359870089cE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (01:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1359870089cE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (01:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
S1359870089cE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (01:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359003744lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (02:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (02:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (02:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (02:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (02:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (02:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (02:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (02:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (02:26) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (02:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (02:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (02:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (02:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (02:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (02:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (02:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (02:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359003744lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (02:27) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360129664wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (06:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (06:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (06:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (06:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (06:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (06:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (06:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (06:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (06:47) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (06:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (06:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (06:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (06:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (06:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (06:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (06:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (06:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360129664wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (06:48) Five-ranking (in sets)
F1360107175aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (07:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (07:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (07:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (07:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (07:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (07:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (07:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (07:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (07:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (07:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (07:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (07:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (07:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (07:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (07:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (07:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (07:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
F1360107175aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (07:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (08:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (08:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (08:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (08:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (08:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (08:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Hk1365176071E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.05 (08:44) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:47) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:48) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360086998rEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.05 (08:49) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
L1359064762sE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.05 (10:45) Yes-or-No (one each)
M1359101569sK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (11:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (11:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (11:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (11:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (11:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (11:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (11:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (11:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (11:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (11:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (11:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (11:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359101569sK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (11:10) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (12:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (12:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (12:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (12:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:08) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (12:09) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (12:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (12:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (12:10) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360129575lE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360129575lE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:11) Five-ranking (one each)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (12:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (12:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (12:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (12:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:31) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.05 (12:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:33) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.05 (12:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (12:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (12:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (12:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (12:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (12:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (12:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.04.05 (14:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.05 (14:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.04.05 (14:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (14:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.04.05 (14:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (14:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.04.05 (14:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (14:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (14:17) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.04.05 (14:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.04.05 (14:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (14:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (14:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (14:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.04.05 (14:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (14:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (14:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1359357689vE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (14:18) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (14:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (14:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (14:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (14:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (14:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098694iEC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.04.05 (14:21) Five-ranking (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1360126059jEK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (15:39) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (16:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (16:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (16:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:05) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (16:06) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:07) Yes-or-No (in sets)
T1360045807g 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
T1360045807g 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (16:09) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:14) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.04.05 (16:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (16:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (16:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (16:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.04.05 (16:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.05 (16:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360116860iE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:15) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (16:50) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (16:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:52) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (16:56) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:56) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (16:56) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.05 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359657675m 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:58) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (16:59) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1360098562hE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (17:00) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (17:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (17:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (17:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (17:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (17:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (17:01) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (17:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (17:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (17:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (17:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (17:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1360098562hE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (17:02) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:32) Yes-or-No (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:33) Yes-or-No (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.04.05 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.05 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2013.04.05 (18:34) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (in sets)
J1359846761wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
J1359846761wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:35) Five-ranking (one each)
Jo1365210941E 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (18:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (18:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (18:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (18:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (18:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (18:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:51) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
Jo1365210941E 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (18:52) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:01) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (19:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (19:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (19:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (19:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
G1360090592rE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (19:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (19:17) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360091513gE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (19:18) Yes-or-No (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (19:25) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.05 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.04.05 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
C1359652170lC 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (19:26) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1360087165nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1360087165nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1360087165nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 0 2013.04.05 (19:45) Yes-or-No (in sets)
L1360087165nE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1360087165nE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1360087165nE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 25 2013.04.05 (19:45) Five-ranking (in sets)
L1359007060aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
L1359007060aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.04.05 (19:43) Five-ranking (one each)
K1360043018wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (20:34) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (20:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (20:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (20:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (20:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (20:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (20:35) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (20:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (20:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (20:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (20:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (20:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (20:36) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.04.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (20:37) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (20:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (20:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (20:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.05 (20:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.04.05 (20:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (20:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (20:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (20:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (20:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (20:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.04.05 (20:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
K1360043018wE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (20:38) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 0 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 0 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:02) Yes-or-No (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 25 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 50 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (in sets)
A1360125750aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
50 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 25 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
50 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
50 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (21:04) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
25 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 75 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 50 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
25 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
50 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
75 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
25 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 25 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 75 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
75 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
50 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
75 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 75 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 50 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
A1360125750aE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
75 2013.04.05 (21:05) Five-ranking (one each)
E1360124063jE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (21:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (21:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (21:20) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (21:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (21:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:21) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
E1360124063jE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:22) Yes-or-No (in sets)
K1359411360kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:40) Yes-or-No (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
K1359411360kE 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:42) Five-ranking (one each)
M1359964366t 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:54) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
100 2013.04.05 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
M1359964366t 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (21:55) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 1 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
Every company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 1 3 Every company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 2 1 No boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (22:04) Yes-or-No (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 1 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
Every boy criticized his own father.
0 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 1 1 Every boy criticized Mike's father. 100 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 2 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
No girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 2 2 No girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her father.
100 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 1 2 (Under the interpretation where her refers to Mary.)
Every girl criticized her own father.
0 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 1 2 Every girl criticized Mary's father. 100 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 2 2 3 (Under the interpretation where its refers to Toyota)
No company praised its own CEO.
0 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 3 2 3 No company praised Toyota's CEO. 100 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)
I1359322158yK 1 2 1 (Under the interpretation where his refers to Mike.)
No boy criticized his father.
100 2013.04.05 (22:05) Five-ranking (in sets)