Experiment No.33 　

schema design	Schema Group #1 {soko/soitu}-no N is a matrix argument. Schema A1 ok NP-ga PP #-cl {soko/soitu}-no N-o V-T 　 ( BVA(NP-#cl, soko/soitu) ) Schema B1 * {soko/soitu}-no N-ga NP-o PP #-cl V-T 　 ( BVA(NP-#cl, soko/soitu) ) Schema C1 ok {soko/soitu}-no N-ga NP-o PP #-cl V-T 　 ( soko/soitu refers to some entity/individual mentioned in the preceding discourse. ) Schema Group #2 soko/soitu is an argument in a relative clause. Schema A2 ok NP-ga PP #-cl [[ ... soko/soitu ... V-T] N]-o V-T 　 ( BVA(NP-#cl, soko/soitu) ) Schema B2 * [[ ... soko/soitu ... V-T] N]-ga NP-o PP #-cl V-T 　 ( BVA(NP-#cl, soko/soitu) ) Schema C2 ok [[ ... soko/soitu ... V-T] N]-ga NP-o PP #-cl V-T 　 ( soko/soitu refers to some entity/individual mentioned in the preceding discourse. ) Schema Group #3 Excluded The binder and the bindee are separated by a clause boundary. Schema A3 ok NP-ga PP #-cl [ ... soko/soitu ... V-T to] V-T 　 ( BVA(NP-#cl, soko/soitu) ) Schema B3 * {soko/soitu}-no N-ga [ ... NP-o PP #-cl V-T to] V-T 　 ( BVA(NP-#cl, soko/soitu) ) Schema C3 ok {soko/soitu}-no N-ga [ ... NP-o PP #-cl V-T to] V-T 　 ( soko/soitu refers to some entity/individual mentioned in the preceding discourse. )
example design	Lexical Group #1 BVA(zidoosya gaisya-cm 3sya, soko) 'BVA(three auto companies, it)' ("zidoosya gaisya-cm" and "3sya" are not adjacent to each other.) Lexical Group #2 BVA(suugaku kyoosi-cm 3nin, soitu) 'BVA(three math teachers, that guy)' ("suugaku kyoosi-cm" and "3nin" are not adjacent to each other.) ( examples change )
test design	accept until 2014/08/15 Yes-or-No (in sets) Included Times shown = 2 The number of Example tokens = 24 Yes-or-No (one each) Included Times shown = 2 The number of Example tokens = 24 Five-ranking (in sets) Excluded Times shown = 1 The number of Example tokens = 12 Five-ranking (one each) Excluded Times shown = 1 The number of Example tokens = 12